• Home   /  
  • Archive by category "1"

Case Study Of Green Building In Singapore

Towards high-density green living: Case studies of green vertical buildings

by Lee Yan Tong on Dec 29, 2015 • 7:52 amNo Comments

Out of the three main pillars of sustainable development for Singapore (figure 1), a major part of environmental sustainability in terms of the built environment comes from the BCA Green Mark Scheme as well as the ABC Waters Programme by PUB (Public Utilities Board).

Figure 1. The 3 Pillars of Sustainable Development for Singapore (MEWR, 2015)

The Green Mark Scheme by Building Construction Authority (BCA) focuses on sustainability in terms of a building’s construction stage, its form and functions with respect to energy efficiency, water efficiency, landscaping functions and passive or active design strategies for thermal comfort (figure 2). BCA has successfully grown the number of green buildings in Singapore from just 17 in 2005 to more than 2,100 today (BCA, 2014).

 

Figure 2. Features of a green mark building (MEWR, 2015)

 

Under the ABC Waters Programme [1] by Public Utilities Board (PUB), design features for buildings can be categorized under the following building elements: Rooftop, sky garden or terrace, balcony, planter box, ground level greenery and green wall or vertical green (figure 3a).

 

Figure 3a. ABC Waters design features for buildings (PUB, 2014)

Other than enhancing the aesthetics of buildings, these green elements perform primarily climatic roles of cooling the surrounding air temperature, reducing ground level runoff and to cleanse and treat stormwater runoff through natural purification processes before reaching the ground level (figure 3b).

Figure 3b. Stormwater is first collected and cleaned (using rain gardens or cleansing biotopes) on the roof and then channelled to the various water features before releasing out to river and reservoir. (PUB, 2014)

Apart from having greenery that serves as climatic strategies and systems that deal with energy efficiency and resource wastage, concepts and proposals of integrating vertical farming with high-density buildings (figure 4) have emerged in recent years, adding on another dimension of how buildings can be environmentally sustainable [3]. Specifically, ‘vertical farm’ that uses hydroponics and aquaponics methods can allow vegetables and fruits to be grown indoors within buildings in contrast to traditional methods of growing on arable land. Often, vertical farming is combined with rainwater and wastewater purification systems to create a sustainable closed loop system that has several advantages [2], making vertical farming much more sustainable than traditional green buildings. In the words of Dr. Dickson Despommier, a leading pioneer of the concept of vertical farming, vertical farms located in urbanized city areas can offer the perfect solution to the main crises the world is facing today, such as deforestation, population increase, climate change, pollution, land scarcity, dwindling ecology, decreasing food supplies, and urban heat island effect (Despommier, 2010).

Figure 4. Prototype of vertical farm by WeberThompson Architects (Despommier, 2010)

Case Study 1: EDITT Tower, Singapore by Architects T R Hamzah & Yeang

Figure 5a. EDITT Tower (T. R. Hamzah & Yeang, 2008)

In Singapore, EDITT Tower is a similar proposal that attempts to integrate greenery and sustainable energy systems into a vertical building. EDITT Tower is an ecological green vertical tower (figure 5a) proposed by Architects T R Hamzah & Yeang in 2008. Planted facades and vegetated terraces consisting of organic local vegetation are designed to wrap around the façade of the 26-storey building in a continuous manner. The vegetation areas constitute 3,841sqm, which is a ratio of 2:1 of gross useable area to gross vegetated area. Carefully selected indigenous plant species ensure that there is no competition with existing species of the locality (figure 5b). Overall, the tower is designed to show how bio-diversity can be enhanced despite being situated in a highly urbanized environment.

 

Figure 5b. Planting concept of EDITT Tower (Divisare, 2008)

 

A crucial urban design issue in skyscraper design is poor spatial continuity between street-level activities with those spaces at the upper-floors of the city’s high-rise towers. This is due to the physical compartmentation of floors inherent in the skyscraper typology. In this design, landscaped ramps are lined with street-activities (stalls, shops, cafes, performance spaces, viewing-decks etc.) all the way up to first 6 floors (figure 5c). This creates a continuous spatial flow from public to less public as a vertical extension of the street, thereby eliminating the problematic stratification of floors inherent in all tall buildings typology.

 

Figure 5c. Floor plans of EDITT Tower (Divisare, 2008)

 

The tower’s green credentials continue inside the tower with ecological features including water self-sufficiency through rainwater-collection and grey-water reuse for both plant irrigation and toilet flushing at over 55% (figure 5d). The design also optimizes recovery and recycling of sewage waste through the creation of compost and bio-gas fuel. The tower also aims to achieve almost 40% energy self-sufficiency through a system of solar panels (figure 5e). The tower will be constructed using many recycled and recyclable materials, and a centralized recycling system will be accessible from each floor (figure 5f).

Figure 5d. Rainwater-collection system comprises of roof-catchment-pan and layers of scallops located at the building’s facade to catch rain-water running off its sides. Water flows through gravity-fed water-purification system, using soil-bed filters. (Divisare, 2008)

 

Figure 5e. Use of PV solar panels for greater energy self-sufficiency, total daily energy output up to 1,744 kWh. (Divisare, 2008)

 

Figure 5f. In-built waste-management system: recyclable materials are separated at source by hoppers at every floor, dropping down to basement waste-separators and taken elsewhere by recycling garbage collection for recycling. (Divisare, 2008)

 

Pushing the boundaries further, what if vertical farming is to be integrated with high-density residential living? In this case, residential planning has to be entirely redefined into a new housing typology that is able to maintain a symbiotic relationship between its occupants and farming systems. This mode of living is perhaps the most idealized version of sustainable living, where food is grown and consumed at an arm’s length, cultivating farm-to-table culture at the most personal level. Even though such a typology has not yet been realized, there do exist bold visions and proposals that display similar strands of thoughts [4].

 

Case Study 2: Stacking Green, Vietnam by Vo Trong Nghia

 

Figure 6a. A dozen layers of concrete planters create a vertical garden on the façade. (Dezeen, 2012)

 

In Saigon, one can frequently see and find potted plants and vegetation planted by local residents in their balconies, courtyards and along the streets. Overtime, this gradually became the character and custom of Saigon. In designing a typical tube house (4x20m wide) for a couple and their mother, Architect Vo Trong Nghia draws inspiration from this custom, resulting in a vertical garden façade at the front of the house (figure 6a).

 

Figure 6b. Concrete planters span between the side walls to cover the front and back facades and are spaced according to the height of the plants, which varies from 25 cm to 40 cm. (Dezeen, 2012)

 

Figure 6c. At the rear of the house, an exterior staircase is positioned between the planters and the back wall, while glazing separates the front of the house from the plants. (Dezeen, 2012)

 

Automatic irrigation pipes fitted inside the planters allow for easy watering and maintenance.

 

Figure 6d. Bedroom interior with green façade (Dezeen, 2012)

 

Spatial design of the interiors also revolves around the central concept of the vertical garden façade, in which there are few partition walls in order to maximize views of the green facades and to encourage ventilation. In addition, the green façade and roof top garden protect its inhabitants from direct sunlight, street noise and pollution (figure 6e).

 

Figure 6e. Sectional diagram of climatic features of green (Arch Daily, 2012)

 

Even though the main intents of integrating rows of greenery into the tube house are mainly for climatic purposes and to form a distinctive green façade, this case study has shown how greenery need not be spatially disconnected from the interiors of the living domain, but can have a considerable impact on how interior spaces are planned and configured. Therefore in envisioning a new housing typology that integrates vertical farming with high-density living, greenery need not merely be placed along external corridors and balconies, but greater spatial integration can further enhance how occupants view the functions of the green and how integral they are to their lifestyles.

 

On the whole, the above two case studies auger well for the future of green living, as the former reflects the technological ability of vertical farming and energy systems to be integrated within vertical buildings, while the latter leads one to envision further possibilities of how greenery can be integrated with the residential domain.

 


Notes

[1] Launched in 2006, ABC Waters Programme harnesses the full potential of Singapore’s water bodies to improve the quality of waters and to integrate drains, canals and reservoirs with the surrounding environment in a holistic way to create ‘Active’, ‘Beautiful’ and ‘Clean’ (ABC) waters for all. See more at: http://www.pub.gov.sg/abcwaters/Pages/default.aspx

[2] Advantages of the vertical farm include: year-round crop production, no weather-related crop failures, no agricultural runoff, allowance for ecosystem restoration, no use of pesticides, herbicides, or fertilizers, use of 70-95% less water, greatly reduced food miles, no more control of food safety and security, new employment opportunities, purification of grey water to drinking water, animal feed from postharvest plant material (Despommier, 2010, p.145-6)

[3] See other projects at: http://www.inspirationgreen.com/vertical-farms

[4] See: http://blakekurasek.com/rethinkingtheverticalfarm.html

References and Bibliography

  • Arch Daily. (2012, January 20). Stacking green / Vo Trong Nghia Architects. Retrieved 21 December 2015, from http://www.archdaily.com/199755/stacking-green-vo-trong-nghia/
  • Building Construction Authority (BCA). (2014). 3rd Green Building Masterplan. Retrieved 21 December 2015, from http://www.bca.gov.sg/Newsroom/pr01092014_3GBM.html
  • Chalcraft, E. (2012, July 9). Stacking Green by Vo Trong Nghia. Dezeen magazine. Retrieved 21 December 2015, from http://www.dezeen.com/2012/07/09/stacking-green-by-vo-trong-nghia/
  • Despommier, D. (2010). The vertical farm: Feeding the world in the 21st century. New York: Thomas Dunne Books/St. Martin’s Press.
  • Divisare. (2008). T. R. Hamzah & Yeang: Editt Tower. Projects. Retrieved 21 December 2015, from http://divisare.com/projects/17296-t-r-hamzah-yeang-editt-tower
  • Kain, A. (2008, October 15). Singapore’s Ecological EDITT Tower. Inhabitat. Retrieved 21 December 2015, from http://inhabitat.com/editt-tower-by-trhamzah-and-yeang/
  • Kurasek, B. (2009, June 1). Rethinking the Vertical Farm. Vertical Farming. Retrieved 21 December 2015, from http://blakekurasek.com/rethinkingtheverticalfarm.html
  • Livesey, J. (2008, October 25). Ecological tower brings natural life back to urban site. World Architecture News. Retrieved 21 December 2015, from http://www.worldarchitecturenews.com/project/2008/10548/tr-hamzah-yeang-sdn-bhd/editt-tower-in-singapore.html
  • Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources Ministry of National Development (MEWR). (2014). Sustainable Singapore Blueprint 2015. Retrieved 21 December 2015, from http://www.mewr.gov.sg/ssb/files/ssb2015.pdf
  • Public Utilities Board (PUB). (2014). ABC Waters Design Guidelines. Retrieved 21 December 2015, from http://www.pub.gov.sg/abcwaters/abcwatersdesignguidelines/Documents/ABC_DG_2014.pdf


Image provided by Building and Construction Authority of Singapore. Copyright ©2014  

Summary
The landmark legislation for Existing Buildings (EB) was enacted in 2012 to support Singapore’s national target of ‘greening’ at least 80% of its building stock by 2030. It signals a shift in Singapore’s focus from new to existing buildings, as part of its second Green Building Master Plan (GBMP), with the first GBMP (2006) focusing on new buildings and the third GBMP (2014) focusing on engaging occupants and tenants.

What is it?
The EB legislation initially focuses on commercial buildings (offices, hotels, retail and mixed developments), and comprises three key elements:

1) Minimum Green Mark1 Certified standard for buildings with gross floor area of at least 15,000 m2
Building owners are required to meet a minimum environmental sustainability standard at the time of an installation or replacement of any water-cooled/air-cooled chiller or unitary system. This aims to spur building owners to install energy efficient centralised air-conditioning systems to reap energy saving benefits over the typical lifespan of 15 to 20 years.

2) Three-yearly energy audit on building cooling system for buildings with gross floor area of at least 15,000 m2
Building owners must engage a Professional Mechanical Engineer or an Energy Auditor registered with the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) to carry out an energy audit2on their chiller system in accordance with the prescribed Code and submit the necessary documents to BCA. This is to ensure that a building cooling system continues to operate efficiently and comply with minimum standards throughout its lifetime.

3) Annual mandatory submission of building information and energy consumption data for all commercial buildings
Building owners submit building information and energy consumption data annually through an online submission portal. The submitted data will form the basis of national building energy benchmarks, which will be shared with building owners to encourage them to improve the energy performance of their buildings.

How does it work?
Under this legislation, all eligible commercial building owners are required to submit building information and energy consumption data starting from 1 July 2013. The Building Energy Submission System (BESS) facilitates seamless data collection by drawing electricity data directly from utilities. Building owners are only required to update any changes to the building information as they arise and review the energy consumption data prior to completing the submission. BESS also includes access to downloadable self-help tools such as a user submission manual, technical guides, and training and demonstration videos.

At the close of the submission period, data collected through BESS is checked for any inconsistencies or data entry errors. Once all the data has been verified, national energy benchmarks for commercial buildings and the findings and benchmarks are shared with building owners via the BESS and the BCA Building Energy Benchmarking Report (BEBR).

CO2 reduction
In 2014, the annual mandatory submission entered its second year of implementation; the compliance rate achieved for the first year of data collection was 99%. Although it is still too early to assess the unique impacts of the legislation on green building practices for existing buildings, various other policies and incentives established by BCA have contributed to a distinct growth in the number of Green Mark rated building projects in Singapore. These now represent about 63 million m2 -  more than 26% of Singapore’s total gross floor area.

A growth in demand for several businesses and services related to building energy efficiency has also been observed. This includes an increase in the number of Green Mark Managers and Professionals trained through various BCA Academy courses, and a growing number of Environmentally Sustainable Design (ESD) consultants.

Next steps
Singapore is currently aiming to train 20,000 green collar specialists by 2020, comprising of industry personnel at Professional, Manager, Executive and Technician (PMET) level, to meet the market demand for design, maintenance and management of green buildings professionals.

Application
Singapore’s legislation package includes a comprehensive set of measures that aim to spur market demand for green services and to substantially cut down emissions from the city-state’s existing buildings.

Further information
To find out more about Singapore’s existing buildings ordinance, the programme’s success factors, challenges and lessons learned please refer to the report Urban Efficiency: A Global Survey of Building Energy Efficiency Policies in Cities, launched by the Tokyo Metropolitan Government and C40 in late 2014 and updated in May 2015.

______________________________________________________________________________

1Green Mark is a certification scheme that incorporates internationally recognized top practices in environmental design and performance.

2The inspection, survey or examination of a building or facility to identify current performance and efficiency improvement opportunities.

One thought on “Case Study Of Green Building In Singapore

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *